Description
Features |
Overall Length: 36cm |
Automated Gate |
Length From Start area: 21 cmm |
Length from Stimulus Area: 15cm |
Acrylic five-choice maze with five apertures |
Color Reward light (red; green; blue; yellow; and white) |
Auto door |
Water tank |
Control box |
Zebrafish pellet dispenser |
Software |
Automatic Feeder
-
The pellet dispenser has an adjustable feeding slide to control the feeding amount
-
The pellet dispenser rotates 3600 to drop the zebrafish pellet food
-
The food delivery unit is placed on the outside of the water tank
External Tank
-
Width 42cm
-
Length 49cm
-
Height 15cm
FIVE APERTURES
- There are five apertures in the goal area
- Each aperture is equipped with a cue light with color (white, red, green, or blue)
- Five fiber optic cables connect to the control box. The cables are waterproof and can be immersed in water.
REWARD LIGHT
- The pellet dispenser has an adjustable feeding slide to control the feeding amount
- The pellet dispenser rotates 3600 to drop the zebrafish pellet food
- The food delivery unit is placed on the outside of the water tank
AUTOMATIC DOOR
- Screw the door on the motor control unit
- Screw the motor unit on the maze acrylic station
- Connect the cable to the control box
CONTROL BOX
- Front panel:Ā Power, status indicators
- Back panel:
- Top row: Five aperture fiber optic light cables and the reward light fiber optic light cable
- Bottom row:
- Power cord: the label indicates the standard voltage of the country
- USB connector: connect to a computer
- Tree prong connector: connecting to the reward light
- Eight prong connector: connecting to the auto door motor

How it works
Introduction
Zebrafish conditioned place preference (CPP) is a popular method for evaluating the rewarding effects of various food substances and psychoactive compounds. This task assesses the positive-reinforcing effects by measuring the zebrafish’s preference for an environment that was previously associated with a particular substance.
The CPP paradigm leverages the zebrafish’s natural preference for black over white. In this assay, the primary stimulus acts as an unconditioned stimulus. When paired with a secondary stimulus (a visual cue) that functions as a conditioned stimulus, it induces an approach behavior towards the paired environment (Darland & Dowling, 2001).
The CPP procedure is typically divided into three phases. In Phase I, zebrafish can explore all compartments of the CPP tank freely, and the time spent in each compartment is recorded to establish a baseline preference. In Phase II, the fish are confined to each compartment and receive either the experimental or control treatment for a set period. During Phase III, zebrafish are again allowed to move freely between compartments, and the time spent in each is recorded to determine their final preference. CPP behavior is quantitatively assessed by subtracting the baseline preference recorded in Phase I from the final preference observed in Phase III.
Quantitative measure of CPP behavior =Ā Ā (Final place preference ā Baseline place preference).
A significant shift towards the compartment conditioned with the experimental treatment indicates that the treatment is rewarding (Mathur et al., 2011).
Darland and Dowling were the trailblazers in developing the CPP behavior model for adult zebrafish (Darland & Dowling, 2001). They created an apparatus specifically to assess the addictive properties of various compounds. In their study, they initially recorded the baseline place preference, then confined the zebrafish to their least preferred compartment while exposing them to cocaine, and finally assessed the change in place preference to determine the effects.
Apparatus and Equipment
The Zebrafish 5-Choice Chamber features a spacious tank measuring 42 x 49 x 15 cm and an inner custom-designed tank dedicated to testing. Built from opaque acrylic, the inner tank includes an automated door dividing it into distinct areas: the food magazine and the stimulus region. The use of opaque acrylic minimizes external visual distractions and reflections within the unit. The food delivery area is situated 21 cm from the gate, while the stimulus area is 15 cm away. Supporting the gate are two acrylic columns attached to the inner tank. The floor design facilitates waste and excess food removal while providing a contrasting background for effective video recording and monitoring.
The stimulus area is designed with a curved layout for optimal visual detection, partitioned into 5 slots with dividers. Each slot houses a stimulus LED emitting bright, distinct-colored light from the food magazine LED. Equipped with an LED light, the food magazine includes a slot for food delivery, positioned outside the testing tank.
This apparatus includes automation software for seamless control of lights and gate operations.
Training Protocol
The subjects must be housed in tanks with stable temperature and pH levels, ensuring these conditions remain consistent throughout sessions to minimize stress or harm to the fish. Adequate aeration and water quality must also be maintained at all times. Automated tracking and video software, such as Noldus Ethovision XT or ANY-Maze, can facilitate behavior tracking and recording. Cameras positioned overhead provide comprehensive monitoring of fish movements and behaviors. Between each subject, it is essential to empty the tank and conduct thorough rinsing before subsequent use to maintain cleanliness and hygiene standards.
The pretraining and training procedures for the fish in the 5-Choice Chamber are as follows:
Data Analysis
The following data can be collected during the 5-Choice Chamber task.
- Number of trials
- Number of correct responses
- Number of incorrect responses
- Latency to initiate the task
- Latency to enter the magazine
- Latency of correct responses
The general testing parameters of response rates are calculated as follows.
Strengths and Limitations
Summary
- Zebrafish 5-Choice Chamber is based on the conventional 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Training apparatus often used in rodents.
- The task is used in the investigation of motor impulsivity and hyperactivity.
- The task is also useful in the evaluation of the effects of pharmacological manipulations on the hyperactivity and impulsivity of the subjects.
- Zebrafish serve as an ideal organism model due to their similar genetic structure to humans and their genetic tractability and the availability of forward genetic phenotype screening.
- Impulsivity and hyperactivity can be affected by several factors.
- The 5-Choice Chamber task can be time-consuming.
References
Parker MO, Millington ME, Combe FJ, Brennan CH (2012).Ā Development and implementation of a three-choice serial reaction time task for zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Brain Res. 227(1):73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.10.037.
Parker, M.O., Brock, A.J., Sudwarts, A., & Brennan, C.H. (2014).Ā Atomoxetine reduces anticipatory responding in a 5-choice serial reaction time task for adult zebrafish. Psychopharmacology (Berl)231(13): 2671ā2679. doi:10.1007/s00213-014-3439-z.
Parker, M.O., Ife, D., Ma, J., Pancholi, M., Smeraldi, F., Straw, C., & Brennan, C.H. (2013).Ā Development and automation of a test of impulse control in zebrafish. Front Syst Neurosci. 7: 65. doi:Ā 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00065.
Robbins TW (2002).Ā The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 163(3-4):362-80.